Hope everyone is having a great holiday weekend. For today's post, we have a question from Gladys. She asked, "Are compilers (Allison Bottke, Chicken Soup, etc.) considered packagers?"
Nope. Let's define terms. Somebody who requests stories from you in order to create a compiled book on a theme (God Allows U Turns, Chicken Soup, etc), which they then sell as a manuscript to a publisher, are compilers.
A packager is somebody who creates the entire book for the publisher. They come up with the concept, hire the writers, get the work done, design the interiors, create the cover, and complete the entire book for the publisher. Normally at the end of the process, the packager turns over a disk that has the entire book on it -- not just the text, as an author would do, but the entire book, complete with page spreads. All the publisher has to do is hand the disk to their printer and push a button. (And sometimes the packager will even have the books printed, so the publisher is simply purchasing pre-printed books.)
Some of us have done packaged books before. I have done it with more than one magic book (that is, books of card tricks for magicians -- PLEASE don't write to me with your concerns about card tricks being the tool of Satan). I concepted the book, wrote it, solicited tricks from other magicians, created the interior, hired the artist and approved the interior drawings, worked with a cover designer to create the cover, edited the whole mess, got bids from printers, and got the books printed and shipped. I then sent a couple sample copies to distributors and sold the entire print run to a magic distributor, who got them into retail stores. In a way, I was my own publisher (but I didn't actually sell them, so really I was just the packager).
Most publishers do packaged books at some point. The benefit is that they get a completed book that requires almost no editing effort, very little creative energy from the team, no time from the art department, etc. All the publisher has to do is to slap the cover of the book into their catalog and sell it.
Packaged books in CBA have basically focused on themed gift books, devotionals, and general inspirational titles. Usually packaged books are high design (that is, they have a lot of interior design elements), and they often are high concept (a line of books around a theme; books aimed at very specific audiences; a one-event type of gift book).
The downside of packaged books has been that they often have a sameness to them, and they sometimes have less than stellar writing. They are not generally author driven, but concept driven, so the publishing house isn't building an author platform with these books. Because they are not driving a particular author, there can be a bit of a flatness to the voice (in my opinion). I suppose one could argue they rarely have great depth, but they exist to inspire or encourage a reader, not to educate readers on systematic theology -- in other words, you get what you pay for, and readers aren't paying $9.99 for "Hugs for Moms" and expecting Brennan Manning.
We've all seen a million little packaged projects: God's Little Instruction Books,Sunshine for Grandma, God's Roadmap for Grads, etc. Each book follows one concept and is intended for a specific audience. We're starting to see some new directions from packagers, particularly with things like Bible studies and books aimed at the teen market. There is also a trend toward books aimed at business professionals.
Does that make sense?
Excellent post, Chip. By being a packager and selling your book on magic to a publisher, I'm guessing you didn't up with a couple of boxes of that book in your garage. If you did, however, what are the chances of buying a signed copy from you?
Posted by: Richard Mabry | May 31, 2010 at 07:26 AM
Pretty good, Richard... but keep in mind this isn't a book for the merely curious. I created a book for hard-core magic enthusiasts -- people who want to move into performing magic routines for a living. So if you're expecting "how to make the Aces pop out of the deck," you'll find this fairly deep waters.
Posted by: chip responds | May 31, 2010 at 10:59 AM
I have a question--it may show my ignorance, but oh, well. What is the industry name for one single-author book and ancillary products based on the brand of the book? I always thought that was sort of packaging, but evidently, I'm wrong. Also, I've asked other publishing "experts," but I'd like to know what you think about including ancillary products in a book proposal--good or bad idea?
Posted by: patriciazell | May 31, 2010 at 05:11 PM
I think the term you're looking for is "brand extension," Pat. Taking the name of the book and extending it to other products. That's a different thing than "book packaging."
Posted by: chip responds | May 31, 2010 at 05:46 PM
Thank you for clarifying that for me. Vocabulary is so important.
Posted by: patriciazell | May 31, 2010 at 06:51 PM
Novelty-format children's books frequently are packager produced as well. The packager's creative team comes up with concepts; then printers who specialize in novelty formats help figure out the best ways to produce the concepts. Novelty formats only work well when they make sense and are closely integrated with the text and art--never when they are just "tacked on." The best children's book packagers work closely with the publisher too, so that the publisher's "feel" gets into the text, art, and design. I learned so much about book production working with a couple of excellent children's book packagers!
Posted by: Diane Stortz | June 01, 2010 at 05:14 AM
What you call packaging appears to be what most of the people who use services like Lulu and Createspace are doing. Do you see benefit in making specific distinctions when referring to activities that are commonly called "self-publishing?"
Posted by: Timothy Fish | June 01, 2010 at 06:00 AM
Not really, Timothy. Usually the design is fairly significant -- something Lulu can't do for you. Think "gift books."
Posted by: chip responds | June 01, 2010 at 10:34 AM
2nd thought: As I have sold many copies of my book Battle for the Soul of Canada through e-mail (which qualifies as social media), does this mean that e-mail as social media is somehow more effective for promotion and sales than Facebook and Twitter. If so, why is this the case, and what if anything can be done about it? What is it about the particular medium that may inhibit such activity from being effective? Is it that everyone is speaking (FBing and Twittering) and few are listening?
Posted by: Ed Hird | June 02, 2010 at 09:56 AM